Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs > Sports > Georgia Tech Football Message Board > Has Georgia(the state) eclipsed Florida as top southern hotbed for "elite BCS talent?"

 Moderated by: BuzzJacket Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2   
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Has Georgia(the state) eclipsed Florida as top southern hotbed for "elite BCS talent?"  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 03:15 am
  PM Quote Reply
11th Post
dressedcheeseside
Letterman


Joined: Fri Apr 18th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 4931
Status: 
Offline
BigB wrote: Them only accounting for SEC recruits is what makes Georgia look better than Florida in this count.

If you take the "SEC level" recruits that went to just FSU and Miami, I'm not so sure Florida wouldn't win this one.
Good point.  Its the SEC bias in the article that assumes if they're not going to the SEC, they suck.

Buuuuuuuuuuuut, on the same token, you then must count all the SEC caliber recruits from Georgia going to the ACC and other conferences.

I wonder if a study has been done showing the total number of BCS signees from each state?  I still think Fla would be ahead of Georgia.



____________________
WrecksNEffect wrote on 5/10/2010: "Just my theory based on limited info."
No truer words ever spoken.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 04:12 am
  PM Quote Reply
12th Post
WrecksNEffect
Politico


Joined: Sat Jun 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 5319
Status: 
Offline
BigB wrote: Them only accounting for SEC recruits is what makes Georgia look better than Florida in this count.

If you take the "SEC level" recruits that went to just FSU and Miami, I'm not so sure Florida wouldn't win this one.
On the flip side Ga.also has that same problem in that Ga. sends a lot of players to ACC & Big East Schools also.

I think the writer was trying to show that since the SEC is generally regarded as the Best CFB Conf., those with inside knowledge of CFB like HCs & Recruiting Coordinators come to Ga. to stock their CFB Programs, I don't think he was trying to do a Ga. vs. Fla. Comparison, but he was using the recruiting habits of SEC schools to show that Ga. is very highly regarded when it come to producing "Elite BCS Caliber CFB Talent".

Ga. has been a solid #4 in numbers of D1-A players produced and a solid #4 in numbers of Ga. HS Players that make NFL rosters for about the last 10 years and they are inching closer to Florida that holds down the #3 spot on both lists.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 12:38 pm
  PM Quote Reply
13th Post
dressedcheeseside
Letterman


Joined: Fri Apr 18th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 4931
Status: 
Offline
WrecksNEffect wrote: BigB wrote: Them only accounting for SEC recruits is what makes Georgia look better than Florida in this count.

If you take the "SEC level" recruits that went to just FSU and Miami, I'm not so sure Florida wouldn't win this one.
On the flip side Ga.also has that same problem in that Ga. sends a lot of players to ACC & Big East Schools also.

I think the writer was trying to show that since the SEC is generally regarded as the Best CFB Conf., those with inside knowledge of CFB like HCs & Recruiting Coordinators come to Ga. to stock their CFB Programs, I don't think he was trying to do a Ga. vs. Fla. Comparison, but he was using the recruiting habits of SEC schools to show that Ga. is very highly regarded when it come to producing "Elite BCS Caliber CFB Talent".

Ga. has been a solid #4 in numbers of D1-A players produced and a solid #4 in numbers of Ga. HS Players that make NFL rosters for about the last 10 years and they are inching closer to Florida that holds down the #3 spot on both lists.
Ranking states by their total numbers of D1-A players is a little misleading.  The 4 highest states are some of the largest populated states in the country, of course they're going to outproduce sparsely populated Wyoming, N. Dakota and Vermont.  I'd like to see how it stacks up per capita.  It is still relevant because its good to be close to the greatest number of players.  Problem is, so are a lot of other schools, many of which are "factories" that play "hide the athlete."

aside:  rex, even if GT offered the same majors as the factories (leisure studies, ha, college studies, ha ha) they'd still be way more difficult at GT because of GT's high academic standards(GT is a "weedout" school first and foremost.)  This fact would still point the athletes seeking the "easy road" to the "factories."  Don't kid yourself, most "elite BCS talent" want the path of least resistance to the NFL.

double aside:  how'd you like my excessive use of " "?

Last edited on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 01:03 pm by dressedcheeseside



____________________
WrecksNEffect wrote on 5/10/2010: "Just my theory based on limited info."
No truer words ever spoken.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 12:43 pm
  PM Quote Reply
14th Post
rumcreek
Member
 

Joined: Wed Jun 14th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 445
Status: 
Offline
This is true.They have to be fast to outrun the snakes and alligators to make it to age 18.Some even have to be faster than a speeding train or bullet.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 01:13 pm
  PM Quote Reply
15th Post
WrecksNEffect
Politico


Joined: Sat Jun 17th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 5319
Status: 
Offline
dressedcheeseside wrote: WrecksNEffect wrote: BigB wrote: Them only accounting for SEC recruits is what makes Georgia look better than Florida in this count.

If you take the "SEC level" recruits that went to just FSU and Miami, I'm not so sure Florida wouldn't win this one.
On the flip side Ga.also has that same problem in that Ga. sends a lot of players to ACC & Big East Schools also.

I think the writer was trying to show that since the SEC is generally regarded as the Best CFB Conf., those with inside knowledge of CFB like HCs & Recruiting Coordinators come to Ga. to stock their CFB Programs, I don't think he was trying to do a Ga. vs. Fla. Comparison, but he was using the recruiting habits of SEC schools to show that Ga. is very highly regarded when it come to producing "Elite BCS Caliber CFB Talent".

Ga. has been a solid #4 in numbers of D1-A players produced and a solid #4 in numbers of Ga. HS Players that make NFL rosters for about the last 10 years and they are inching closer to Florida that holds down the #3 spot on both lists.
Ranking states by their total numbers of D1-A players is a little misleading.  The 4 highest states are some of the largest populated states in the country, of course they're going to outproduce sparsely populated Wyoming, N. Dakota and Vermont.  I'd like to see how it stacks up per capita.  It is still relevant because its good to be close to the greatest number of players.  Problem is, so are a lot of other schools, many of which are "factories" that play "hide the athlete."

aside:  rex, even if GT offered the same majors as the factories (leisure studies, ha, college studies, ha ha) they'd still be way more difficult at GT because of GT's high academic standards(GT's is a "weedout" school first and foremost.)  This fact would still point the athletes seeking the "easy road" to the "factories."  Don't kid yourself, most "elite BCS talent" wants the path of least resistance to the NFL.

double aside:  how'd you like my excessive use of " "?

Why do you continue to GROSSLY MISREPRESENT things that I write?

I have only mentioned 3 additional majors for GT, and those 3 are Communications, Poli. Sci., and Sociology, and I mentioned those 3 for the express purpose of getting more good looking Females on campus so that GT can have Social Environment closer to a normal College Environment.

My question for you is, WHY do you reply to me and use my name specifically when you know that I have never mentioned anything like College Studies or Leisure Studies?

That sort of Message Board Etiquette makes you come across as a P-o-S Liar, and I don't have to tell you what P-o-S stands for.

At least try to be ethical if you are going to attribute something to someone or give the appearance that you are attributing something to someone.

I don't give a sh*t how you use what keys on your keyboard when you type what you want to type, I'm not writing friggin' ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS, I'm talking sports, and CFB at  that, and folks like you "wonder WHY" GT can't pick up any Sidewalk Alums to give a crap about GT FB.

I guess weasels like you worry more about SYNTAX than friggin' HONESTY!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 01:34 pm
  PM Quote Reply
16th Post
dressedcheeseside
Letterman


Joined: Fri Apr 18th, 2008
Location:  
Posts: 4931
Status: 
Offline
WrecksNEffect wrote: dressedcheeseside wrote: WrecksNEffect wrote: BigB wrote: Them only accounting for SEC recruits is what makes Georgia look better than Florida in this count.

If you take the "SEC level" recruits that went to just FSU and Miami, I'm not so sure Florida wouldn't win this one.
On the flip side Ga.also has that same problem in that Ga. sends a lot of players to ACC & Big East Schools also.

I think the writer was trying to show that since the SEC is generally regarded as the Best CFB Conf., those with inside knowledge of CFB like HCs & Recruiting Coordinators come to Ga. to stock their CFB Programs, I don't think he was trying to do a Ga. vs. Fla. Comparison, but he was using the recruiting habits of SEC schools to show that Ga. is very highly regarded when it come to producing "Elite BCS Caliber CFB Talent".

Ga. has been a solid #4 in numbers of D1-A players produced and a solid #4 in numbers of Ga. HS Players that make NFL rosters for about the last 10 years and they are inching closer to Florida that holds down the #3 spot on both lists.
Ranking states by their total numbers of D1-A players is a little misleading.  The 4 highest states are some of the largest populated states in the country, of course they're going to outproduce sparsely populated Wyoming, N. Dakota and Vermont.  I'd like to see how it stacks up per capita.  It is still relevant because its good to be close to the greatest number of players.  Problem is, so are a lot of other schools, many of which are "factories" that play "hide the athlete."

aside:  rex, even if GT offered the same majors as the factories (leisure studies, ha, college studies, ha ha) they'd still be way more difficult at GT because of GT's high academic standards(GT's is a "weedout" school first and foremost.)  This fact would still point the athletes seeking the "easy road" to the "factories."  Don't kid yourself, most "elite BCS talent" wants the path of least resistance to the NFL.

double aside:  how'd you like my excessive use of " "?

Why do you continue to GROSSLY MISREPRESENT things that I write?

I have only mentioned 3 additional majors for GT, and those 3 are Communications, Poli. Sci., and Sociology, and I mentioned those 3 for the express purpose of getting more good looking Females on campus so that GT can have Social Environment closer to a normal College Environment.

My question for you is, WHY do you reply to me and use my name specifically when you know that I have never mentioned anything like College Studies or Leisure Studies?

That sort of Message Board Etiquette makes you come across as a P-o-S Liar, and I don't have to tell you what P-o-S stands for.

At least try to be ethical if you are going to attribute something to someone or give the appearance that you are attributing something to someone.

I don't give a sh*t how you use what keys on your keyboard when you type what you want to type, I'm not writing friggin' ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS, I'm talking sports, and CFB at  that, and folks like you "wonder WHY" GT can't pick up any Sidewalk Alums to give a crap about GT FB.

I guess weasels like you worry more about SYNTAX than friggin' HONESTY!
First, good morning mr. sunshine.:)

Second, I never said you said to offer leisure studies or college studies, now did I.  Maybe you should brush up on your RC skills? (that's reading comprehension)

Thirdly, and most importantly, you completely missed my point.  As you were so busy highlighting the part of my post you pissed your panties over, you missed the second part of that very same sentence.  Any major GT offers will be hard.  The english classes I took at GT were hard as I recall how much time it took to do all the reading and writing assignments for 3 measly hours of credit.

Your precious "elite BCS caliber" athletes don't want "hard" when it comes to the classroom nomatter what name you give it.  Like I said, they want the "path of least resistance" to the NFL.



____________________
WrecksNEffect wrote on 5/10/2010: "Just my theory based on limited info."
No truer words ever spoken.
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 01:51 pm
  PM Quote Reply
17th Post
yellowbritchies
Letterman


Joined: Mon Jun 19th, 2006
Location:  
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
Can't we all be gentlemen here?:)

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 02:09 pm
  PM Quote Reply
18th Post
Architorture
Member
 

Joined: Wed Feb 4th, 2009
Location:  
Posts: 578
Status: 
Offline
BigB wrote: Them only accounting for SEC recruits is what makes Georgia look better than Florida in this count.

If you take the "SEC level" recruits that went to just FSU and Miami, I'm not so sure Florida wouldn't win this one.


MrSEC could have saved us a lot of time by just totaling up the # of BCS players signed from each state.  Maybe even total them by rank to appease the folks that care about stars.  Florida would still have more.  (BTW, Miami and FSU signed a total of 29 kids from the state of Florida this year.)

Its California, Texas, Florida (in no particular order), then the rest of the states, which, I believe, Georgia is at the top of.

Last edited on Tue Feb 9th, 2010 02:09 pm by Architorture



____________________
"It ain't just a game, dog." - Mack
Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 9th, 2010 10:53 pm
  PM Quote Reply
19th Post
GoldZ
Member
 

Joined: Sun Dec 23rd, 2007
Location:  
Posts: 68
Status: 
Offline
No.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Feb 10th, 2010 12:07 am
  PM Quote Reply
20th Post
pckl300
Member


Joined: Mon Dec 8th, 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia USA
Posts: 671
Status: 
Offline
WrecksNEffect wrote: All those "Elite BCS caliber" recruits that I speak of would LOVE to spend their college Careers at GT IN ATLANTA, but GT's stupid ass doesn't have Communications & Sociology & Political Science that would allow GT to attract MORE DECENT-LOOKING WOMEN, there are plenty of CFB Players that are both Elite AND can Graduate in Mgmt. or Econ., but GT's friggin' problem is that there aren't enough decent looking Women to entice them to come to GT to try and Graduate from GT.

Why would I major in Mgmt. or Econ at GT when I can go to Texas, USCw, or Florida and major in the same thing (it is not like GT's Mgmt or Econ Majors are any better than those-3 above) and have more HOT WOMEN to choose from?

The Reality is, is that most Elite CFB Players DO NOT want to major in Engineering (so in reality GT has no real advantage Academically for Recruits), so for purposes of Recruiting then GT's "Academics" should be compared using our Mgmt. & Econ. majors vs. other schools, and since that GAP is NOT that big (in eliteness) for Mgmt & Econ, then GT has no advantage academically for the "typical" (non Darryl Richard) CFB Player.

We COULD have it all to ourselves & UGAy, but GT does everything in the most UNINTELLIGENT MANNER that they can find, while still beating their chests about GT being "Academically Elite".

What a friggin' school!

Um, no. This is the Georgia Institute of Technology, not the Georgia Institute of Football Recruiting, or the Georgia Institute of Easy Education. The priorities of the Institute are (in this order): research, research, research, academics, football.

And, I'm pretty sure you can major in Modern Language, Sociology, and Political Science. Link to majors. Try again Wrexie; a lack of majors is not the reason we don't have any girls.

Though, we don't offer a BA. Even the Ivan Allen College of Liberal Arts gives BS degrees; they all incorporate science in some way. There's still Calc I, II, and III, and a lab requirement.

Last edited on Wed Feb 10th, 2010 12:14 am by pckl300

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 12:06 am Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2     
Georgia Tech Football Message Boards Forums Blogs > Sports > Georgia Tech Football Message Board > Has Georgia(the state) eclipsed Florida as top southern hotbed for "elite BCS talent?" Top




UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2008 Data 1 Systems